Wed, Jul 2nd 2014 12:13pm —As Mike recently covered, SoundCloud's infringement takedown system has more than. The EFF's Parker Higgins had uploaded a recording of the Apollo 13 astronauts, something clearly in the public domain, but SoundCloud took it down and the 'remedies' available to Higgins all assumed the removed content was covered by someone's copyright. And, like many takedown notices, there was no indication who had requested the removal, or if it was simply SoundCloud's making bad assumptions.Now, there's more bad news for users of SoundCloud's service. Apparently, Universal Music Group has the power to directly pull tracks without issuing a takedown request to SoundCloud.

• How To Make A Soundcloud Bot
• Soundcloud Bot Reddit

This has resulted in with the only recourse available being to contact Universal directly to dispute the takedown.The user, Mr Brainz, pointed out to SoundCloud that he sees some inconsistencies in its copyright enforcement. His account is being targeted but other mixes from other users are being left alone, despite their inclusion of copyrighted tracks.click through for a larger versions of these screenshotsSoundCloud's response to his complaints was basically, 'It's out of our hands.'

For musicians, growing a solid reputation on SoundCloud is key, as the platform provides opportunities to take their work to the next level,. Soundcloud bot activation key Soundcloud Manager gives you all the tools you need to handle your own Soundcloud Promotion. If you want something doing. Take the controls and learn how: soundcloud. Help your audience discover your sounds. Let your audience know what to hear first. With any Pro plan, get Spotlight to showcase the best of your music & audio at the top of your profile.

Your uploads were removed directly by Universal. This means that SoundCloud had no control over it, and they don't tell us which part of your upload was infringing. If you look at your tracklist it may help you find the Universal content they wanted blocked.The control of removing content is completely with Universal. This means I can't tell you why they removed your uploads and not others, and you would really need to ask them that question.I don't know what method they use to find infringing material unfortunately. Their anti-piracy team are based in the US.SoundCloud now has a YouTube problem. In an agreement reached in 2011, the same sort of direct access, which in by the label. This looks like more of the same.

While SoundCloud is certainly under a lot of pressure to police uploads for infringing content, handing direct control over to an entity that once was never going to work out well.Now that Mr Brainz's problems have gone public, and it doesn't add anything to the discussion.As a responsible hosting platform, we work hard to ensure that everyone's rights are respected. In the case of rights holders, that means having processes in place to ensure that any content posted without authorisation is removed quickly and efficiently.In the case of users, that means having separate processes in place to ensure that any content removed in error can be reinstated equally quickly.

If any user believes that content has been removed in error - for example, because they had the necessary permissions from Universal Music and/or any other rights holder - then they are free to dispute the takedown.Translated from PR speak, the statement basically says that the end user is out of luck, especially in the case of Universal's direct takedowns. Does anyone seriously believe Universal will look into challenged takedowns? There's nothing in this unfortunate partnership that indicates Universal can be held accountable for bogus takedowns.

Beyond that, there's nothing in the long history of the DMCA that indicates any rights holder will be held responsible for bogus takedowns, much less be willing to engage in a useful discussion about fair use or other edge cases.If Universal orders a takedown, the content is gone and the user's account is one step closer to being shut down. End of story. In Universal's case, there's no consideration given ever for fair use. Other takedowns, some of them the result of a misfiring algorithm, can still be disputed, but the process SoundCloud has provided doesn't factor in fair use, public domain or other instances that aren't clearly cases of infringement.

And if you get enough bogus takedowns, your account - even your paid Pro account - is dead and SoundCloud won't be handing out refunds.When a service becomes popular enough that infringement detection needs to be automated, problems are necessarily going to arise. Bots aren't perfect, but that's the reality of the situation if you're going to retain your safe harbors. But giving rights holders the ability to directly pull the plug on content is a bad idea and providing no real avenue for dispute only makes it worse.Filed Under:,Companies. MU processed them super fast despite not being bound by US law.You are thinking of HotFile where they gave WB(iirc) special access and they went hog wild deleting things they did not own, had no rights to, and just didn't like the fact it was there. Iirc (what I'm old) they were real worried about this coming out in court when they were suing HotFile as a jury might go what do you mean you gave them way more power than the law allowed, they abused the hell out of it, and still sued you?!. Yes indeed, those 'pirate' sites are really running scared, barely hanging on. Nah, it's nowhere near the end.

People will go back to f-serves and ftp announces on irc like from say 2006 and prior if push came to shove that hard (meaning there's still loads of means).I'm a guitarist and I've got several videos of me covering classic thrash metal bands on youtube with the real track playing in the back with my (well, after lots of practice and imo) guitar just perfectly playing over it so you hear what I'm doing. Never had a single takedown and there's one cover of a particularly difficult song to play where I got 15 000 hits, and the content id bullshit hasn't been able to do crap, and I cover some Slayer who without any of them making a move to do so ended up on a major label since the mid 90's (label mergers).When they manage to take this sort of stuff down is when I'm gonna be outraged. I remember when they tried to take down LYRICS sites and also GUITAR TABS around 2007-2008, they succeeded in killing many sites and now stuff impossible to find, that I have printed thankfully, but their fight will always be in vain. What about the actual independent artists who use this platform to distribute and promote their own works, which Universal can now remove at a whim if they don't like them?Nah, you don't give a shit about them do you, only your corporate gods. You're to stupid to even recognise the promotional value (and thus increased revenue) for Universal in the mixes being removed, let alone give a crap about the innocent people who are guaranteed to be affected by this.Just keep on with the same lies, it will hopefully speed your own demise. Seriously torrentfreak is amazing and i love the fact that i can see these illegal actions and justify my sharing content with others more and more each day.I cannot wait for the day someone decides enough is enough and has the financial backing to sue these music monopolists into oblivion.

How To Make A Soundcloud Bot

Beyond that, there's nothing in the long history of the DMCA that indicates any rights holder will be held responsible for bogus takedowns, much less be willing to engage in a useful discussion about fair use or other edge cases.Unless I'm missing something, these are not DMCA takedowns, which means the (theoretical) limits, protections, and punishments in the DMCA don't apply here. Universal, and any other company that can strong-arm SoundCloud into giving them this level of control can simply lay claim to, and pull, whatever they feel like, with no limits at all, and no punishments if they get it wrong.I can only hope that enough users of the site learn about this is are willing to drop their accounts there and move elsewhere, causing a noticeable hit to SoundCloud's profits, as after selling out their customers like this SoundCloud deserves to suffer for it. These aren't DMCA takedowns, but they're still built upon the foundation laid by the DMCA, which established the basic principle that content can be removed by an extrajudicial process involving an accusation alone, and then the person posting the content is considered guilty until proven innocent. The DMCA lies at the root of everything bad about digital copyright in the modern age, and every newer abuse we've seen enacted or proposed builds upon it.When a weed grows in your garden, there are two ways to get rid of it. You can cut it off at the ground, and it's gone. Until it pops up again.

Or you can rip it out by the roots, and then it's gone. The only way to truly fix copyright abuse is to rip it out by the roots: repeal and reverse the DMCA.

Restore the sacred legal principles of Due Process and the Presumption of Innocence. Outlaw the use of DRM in any form for any reason. Make it crystal clear that the rights of people, not copyright owners, come first, and no one has any right whatsoever to infringe upon them until they have been proven guilty in a court of law.Only when we've managed to accomplish this will we make any meaningful progress against copyright abuse. But as long as the root's still in the ground the same weed keeps popping up.

Soundcloud Bot Reddit

We cut off SOPA and PIPA, and now we've got it growing right back as the TPP. Looks like we've just about managed to kill that one, but it'll grow back again soon enough (and it really didn't take long, did it?) unless we rip it out by the roots!.

When Dharma gets back from returning Steve to the stables, it's 3:00 am and Greg is missing, so she calls Pete, who assumes the worst and swears that Greg is passed out drunk on his floor. Groom Joaquin swears it's because the horse has fallen madly in love with Dharma - and sure enough Steve starts showing up unexpectedly (and inexplicably) at the apartment. First his parents take them on a mock foxhunt, and the uncontrollably wild stallion at the stables becomes meek as a lamb as she as he meets Dharma (who nicknames him 'Steve'). Meanwhile, Greg's old flame Barbara (guest Coyle reprises her role from episode five) is assigned to work with him on a case with an overnight deadline, but has to go home to deal with a plumbing emergency, so Greg accompanies her, and over several hours of hard work they both fall asleep. Dharma and greg season 3.

SoundcloudRobot FeaturesSoundcloudRobot V 1.0.82 CrackedFixed issue with unfavoritingAdded Unfavoriting ability. See command list for how-toAuto following additional customers who match comparable interests- SoundcloudRobot will immediately gather users that match interests you specify (i.e.